what oppression?
– Julian Dibbell, from “A Rape In Cyberspace,” 1993 [here] but quoted by Alan Jacobs in an article titled:
The Artist’s Lens
to draw attention to it for the reason that it has this upsetting subtitle: “What It Means to See the World With an Eye Toward a Facebook Update”
Qu’est-ce qu’un acte de création? – Gilles Deleuze, 1987
source of clichéed philosophical disdain for dirty history in the academicist mode, Kant to Hegel
“It would appear no law-governed history of mankind is possible …We can scarcely help feeling a certain distaste on observing their activities as enacted in the greatworld-drama … everything as a whole is made up of folly and childish vanity, and often ofchildish malice and destructiveness…. The only way
“among those who care about such matters”
Matthew Stewart’s Leibniz epitomises the reactive attitude towards our modernity, a modernity represented by Spinoza, in his compelling narrative. Something has been subtracted from Leibniz’s philosophy launching it as an untotalizable multiplicity. In this regard, he resembles Badiou reacting always to the immanence of Deleuze, even when Deleuze
holey tactility
‘[T]ouch is the space of the gap, not the connection’ – McLuhan, quoted in Charlie Gere, Community without Community in Digital Culture, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2012
a letter to empyre soft_skinned_space on the subject of screens added here for interest even if leaving much unsaid
My father went to the cinema every Saturday where he saw the newsreels showing the liberation of the camps. The two things were always linked in his reminiscence: the joy of the screen and its stars and ‘having to see’ what ‘had to be seen.’ ‘Had to be’ because the