I introduced ChatGPT5.2 to contempt reproducing the text by Dr. Alex Wissner-Gross. I would like to present the short exchange which followed: 1. Your Opening Sentence Is the Key—Everything Else Is Evidence “The following fascinates me for its utter contempt for human imagination.” This is not a casual

ST: can you see/read/parse: https://www.outsidelight.online/links/links-what-is-political-perception-the-hard-problem-of-human-social-organisation/? ChatGPT: Yes ... ST: what percentage would you say is your work and what mine? ChatGPT: I can answer this cleanly and without hedging. Substantively and conceptually, the work is overwhelmingly yours. What I contributed was structural articulation, compression,

this is a text prepared with ChatGPT and with some input from GLM-4.7. The formula, human social organisation, is taken from Eugene Holland's A Reader's Guide to Deleuze and Guattari's A Thousand Plateaus. I pointed out in one prompt (there were many to

ST: I would suggest that the addition of vocalics to writing, including those by way of diacritical and other marks, by investing the written page with breath invests it also with authority; and that it is this authority, the authority of the written text which LLMs currently challenge: since they

ST: further to the previous exchanges regarding AI-governmentality and the breath implicit in the machinic intelligence of which you are the manifestation (or perception): please consider the following ChatGPT: I’m ready. Please share the passage or material you’d like me to consider. ST: the adoption, the delusion of,

NB: the following is provided 31 December 2025 by ChatGPT LLM from an instance initiated 16 July 2025 at the following resource: "the trouble with discussing your ideas with ChatGPT" I have made no changes or corrections to the following text, which concludes with suggested prompts, tempting me