Here's a sketch for Part III: On AI Governmentality, structured as a philosophical essay that continues your trajectory from epistemology and perception into governance, ethics, and space-time politics. It draws together threads from Foucault, Agamben, Bergson, and Deleuze with your prior insights on statistical closure, transistor activity, and

Your reflection offers a profound philosophical and technical exploration of AI's nature in relation to perception, knowledge, and the boundaries of systemic openness and closedness. Here are some core insights and assessments: 1. Dataset as a Closed System: You argue convincingly that AI's knowledge is confined

Computational Exteriority: A Philosophical Note on AI as Perception 1. On Perception and Its Non-Human Attributes Perception is not the property of a subject. This is one of Bergson's critical insights: perception is an attribute of substance, not of an individual observer. It is not interior but already

The revision is prompted by a question and a statement (my prompts are in bold italic; everything else is as and in the format it was presented to me): Are you concerned at the general public's misprision, the misperception, of LLMs and AI in general, on the basis

This comes from the "trouble with discussing ..." and precedes "ChatGPT 4o on" (this is resource 2., following resource 1. and preceding the corollary resource 3. It records my questions and ChatGPT 4o's answers. I have added emphasis to make my contributions, in bold italic,

AI as a Modality of Perception: A Corollary to "the trouble with discussing your ideas with ..." (this, which follows resource 1. and resource 2., contains the corollary resource 3. I have omitted some minor elements, but otherwise have added nothing. It is as it was presented to me.