outside light (Page 3)

outside light

Sign in Subscribe

⑦ How Cinema Has Changed Our Minds

⑦ How Cinema Has Changed Our Minds

or, How Recording Moving Images Has Changed Our Minds Indirectly, I've heard a reader ask, Where's he heading with these philosophers he's talking about? and, because it's gratifying to be read, I am answering the question. The philosophers I have been writing

Gertrude Stein, Mother of AI {- X² + Laurie Anderson = links resource}

Gertrude Stein, Mother of AI {- X² + Laurie Anderson = links resource}

X² ~90% complete compiled from best available sources Big thanks to all who contributed! *** = missing, no recording at all Intro: Ordo Amoris - The Order Of Love Rome/R2 https://www.facebook.com/.../pcb.../1504921594068414 Rome/ARTE https://www.facebook.com/.../pcb.../1902522350475999 We've Got Four Big Clocks

⌂ theatre | ⚗ theory | 𝄐 cinema | ؎ literature | 𒈨 art | ⏚ practice (Deleuze & Guattari, Bergson, Spinoza) | minus ↩

⌂ theatre | ⚗ theory | 𝄐 cinema | ؎ literature | 𒈨 art | ⏚ practice (Deleuze & Guattari, Bergson, Spinoza) | minus ↩

On the strength of Ghost introducing a search tool, today I updated my site's meta-data, as per the title of this post. You can form your interpretation as you see fit of what it means. With the caveat in mind that we are allowing the proliferation of a

⑥ indirect proof of the unity of the executive functions we associate with the subject, ego or self

⑥ indirect proof of the unity of the executive functions we associate with the subject, ego or self

I'm going to start with a long quote from Bergson but only pick out one or two threads to follow briefly: [from Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer's translation, Zone Books, NY, 1991. Online edition, at p.56, may differ.] This is to say that

⓪ The proof of the infinity of attributes

⓪ The proof of the infinity of attributes

For Spinoza, God or Nature, Substance, has infinite attributes of which we have access only to two: thought and extension. If perceptions are outside, they are attributes of substance. Bergson solves Spinoza's problem. To put it like this, Bergson solves Spinoza's problem, is completely false: that

⑤ virtual images

⑤ virtual images

The problem I have been dealing with is that of limiting virtual images to the body. Bergson's motor-diagramme seems to distinguish movements, the movements specifically across the surface of the brain of electrical impulses, to limn out the forms particular to . . . as I am doing now . . . the words

④ The Region of Images

Yes, this has the same title as a previous digest post, but there it was ambivalent. For Bergson it means the region of images in the brain, that in his time psychology asserted and in ours that neuroscience asserts, which he denies there being. (We might adapt Bergson's