or, How Recording Moving Images Has Changed Our Minds Indirectly, I've heard a reader ask, Where's he heading with these philosophers he's talking about? and, because it's gratifying to be read, I am answering the question. The philosophers I have been writing

X² ~90% complete compiled from best available sources Big thanks to all who contributed! *** = missing, no recording at all Intro: Ordo Amoris - The Order Of Love Rome/R2 https://www.facebook.com/.../pcb.../1504921594068414 Rome/ARTE https://www.facebook.com/.../pcb.../1902522350475999 We've Got Four Big Clocks

On the strength of Ghost introducing a search tool, today I updated my site's meta-data, as per the title of this post. You can form your interpretation as you see fit of what it means. With the caveat in mind that we are allowing the proliferation of a

I'm going to start with a long quote from Bergson but only pick out one or two threads to follow briefly: [from Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer's translation, Zone Books, NY, 1991. Online edition, at p.56, may differ.] This is to say that

For Spinoza, God or Nature, Substance, has infinite attributes of which we have access only to two: thought and extension. If perceptions are outside, they are attributes of substance. Bergson solves Spinoza's problem. To put it like this, Bergson solves Spinoza's problem, is completely false: that

The problem I have been dealing with is that of limiting virtual images to the body. Bergson's motor-diagramme seems to distinguish movements, the movements specifically across the surface of the brain of electrical impulses, to limn out the forms particular to . . . as I am doing now . . . the words